gonna need all stirner-heads who think he was an anarchist to read the rest of the young hegelians - not because they outwit stirner or anything - but just so they know what stirner was actually responding to instead of repeatedly injecting their own meaning
@exiliaex i 100% distrust stirner's "anarchism" due to the fact he believes property belongs to whomever can defend it the best...that isn't anarchy, that just seems like propertarianism. stirner has a lot of good critiques, but like nietzche, has flaws
@exiliaex i do wonder how much of it is that he's relevant to the tradition thus it becomes harder to approach him entirely separate from that tradition
like a slipping fron "thinker relevant to the anarchist tradition" to "anarchist thinker"