politics; marxists 

the center-marxist DSA group that centers around cosmonaut are the best example how orthodox marxism can become indistinguishable from fascism via figures like kautsky

politics; marxists 

you cant delegitimize all political activity that doesnt take the form of electoralism, delegitimize all violence that isnt from the state, advocate a regulation of the social body by direct control of the organs of the proletariat, and follow nationalists like Lasalle and Kautsky, and then be surprised when people notice that youre not exactly offering a picture of liberation

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex my eyes glazedd over reading this youre just like the marxists

re: politics; marxists 

@errante thats rude

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex no but like ylure jsing the political thoight ans language of the marxists its lame

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex like, marx n marxists define the notion behind the world proletariat, right? and that notion isnt particularly anarchistic, because its the opposite & its classist, but u still use it

re: politics; marxists 

@errante wait what? marx argues for the proletriat to abolish itself. its description as the proletariat is a descriptor, not a prescription

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex his descriptor is defined in opposite to the lumpen class and the bourgoise class

re: politics; marxists 

@errante its not in opposition to lumpen, thats not really accurate to his version

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex i thunk that defining your classes by sieving out vulnerable people is defining in opposition

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex by defining a proleyariat and a bad proletariat, you do the same thing as selling a cereal and a cereal without asbestos - the descriptor on the second redefines the first

re: politics; marxists 

@errante is there such a thing as a rotten fruit or vegetable? is there still purpose in categorizing apples together even if some apples are rotten? i think so. the proletariat isnt 'the good guys' its just a class descriptor.

re: politics; marxists 

@errante the lumpen aren't the bad guys, they just aren't, functionally, to capital-society, the same kind of position. as a class, their interests tend to culminate differently. i personally tend to lean towards the lumpen side of this, if we're using a marxist formulation, but i don't think a marxist formulation is the only useful one here (and plenty of marxists *don't* think lumpen are "counter-revolutionary, just so you know)

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex the fsct that they accept the lumpen as existin gin the firsy place is the problem

also the lumpen are absolutely the bad guys because anyone counter revolutionary is a bad guy to a marxist. thats why they throw the term at peoole they dislike
Follow

re: politics; marxists 

@errante but not all marxists define the lumpen as counter revolutionary.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex thwy still define em as an underclass! they still define em seperately to some notion of prole where no such clear line can be drawn

re: politics; marxists 

@errante because their relation to production in relation to the capital and value valorization process is different!

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex im goong to kill myself i hate talking to polecoomers go talk to my gf she loves polecon @driftwood

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @driftwood its important to understand polecon so our politics dont replicate polecon!!!! the separation between lumpen and proles is a separation that only exists due to value-production and its need to self-valorize!!! this is why i like using a marxist discourse! this is its use!!!

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex @driftwood uou sound like a poleconer and i hate them sorry

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @driftwood i haven't said almost anything wrt political economy in so long. can you find me a post of mine that does so?

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex @driftwood > because their relation to production in relation to the capital and value valorization process is different!

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @driftwood yeah, i was trying to show you the usefulness a marxist angle could have in analyzing the motions of the proccesses and forces around us. you brought up lumpen as a way to discredit marxism. i didn't bring them up.

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @driftwood anyways, you don't follow me and you don't care so i don't care about this conversation anymore. have nice day.

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex @driftwood i do care 😔 just i am a famed anti-intellectual in political terms

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @driftwood i mean, you quite literally don't care about my actual opinion, this entire thread has been you offended that i might sorta come off like a group you don't like because i sometimes use some of the same terms and comment on some of the same discourses. its a little annoying.

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex @driftwood do you think i was offended? shit lol i need tl change how i come across

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @driftwood i meaaaaaaan you said i was lame for "using the political thought and language of the marxists" that felt like a kind of "offense"

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex @driftwood ah, ok, in that way. not legit offended, dont have a problem w u

re: politics; marxists 

@exiliaex @driftwood a lot of my best friends are lame to me :)

re: politics; marxists 

@driftwood @exiliaex but last night i was def out pixking a fight, sorry lol

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @exiliaex eris says im a polecon-er and that's true to the extent i have done volume 1 and really like heinrich, but i've been very distracted off the topic generally lately, so i don't think i have a much cogent anything to discuss on it lol

im glad to see you're actually hanging out more in fedi doe, s' neat

re: politics; marxists 

@driftwood @exiliaex but we met talking about polecon D:

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @exiliaex i just mean that it's a wide wide topic that i used to be more willing to talk about because i was routinely reading up on it, mostly marx and commentaries on him; and planning to branch out into so many other adjacent areas of philosophy but that, yknow, if i haven't picked up anything on the realm of it in like a year by now? im not going to be able to really follow a conversation on it, even just because of my bad memory

i remember being awestruck by the simple yet seemingly unescapable explanation for how commodity production necessarily begets money, and im sure if i go back and go over it again ill be just as convinced, but i couldn't explain it to someone now without opening myself to a lot of (legitimate!) hard questions asking me to elaborate that i would struggle to answer

re: politics; marxists 

@errante @exiliaex as i have adapted the expression for myself, to say that i am an X-er mostly just signals "i find it a really interesting topic", so in that sense, sure, i still am someone into polecon
Sign in to participate in the conversation
masto.anarch.cc

A small congregation of exiles.